This was one of Fantasy Flight Games (FFG) ventures into unique games (the other attempt being Keyforge). Stealing FFGs blurb: "Every copy of Discover: Lands Unknown is unlike any other in the world. A mix of environments, storylines, characters, locations, items, and enemies have been engineered to tell a story unique to every copy of the game thanks to an algorithm that ensures no two copies are alike."
Whew! May 14th 2019... the last time I posted. Let's kick start the 2020 tires by posting to this web log.
First up; Christmas has come and gone and with it so has a slew of new board games to give a try. Here are some thoughts on a couple.
Discover: Lands Unknown
General critical consensus seems to be that Discover: Lands Unknown was a flop, but I found the game to be engaging and enjoyable while delivering on its core mechanic of a survival experience.
In my first game I lost a fight with a bull moose and watched from the sideline as my wife and oldest son survived onwards before starvation nabbed them both in the middle of the night.
Better oriented in follow up plays we were more successful as a party of survivors. Keeping supplies of food and fresh water are key; crafting flint to start fires is also a good idea. Weapons are helpful, but combat (other than if required by your unique scenario) is better avoided (as evidenced by my scrap with a bull moose).
One aspect that I found interesting (but did not explore while playing with my family) was the potential for players competing with each other. As far as I can tell there is no overt direction by the game that players should cooperate, but it does become apparent that survival is easier together. With that said the game puts players in interesting positions to overtly (or covertly) compete with each other. It could be as simple as the elected Tribal Leader moving a monster towards one player vs another or one of the players holding off on crafting a key item so the rest of the party can't get access to it. In the Tribal Leader case it is an overt act and this can kick off a debate at the table of whether a change at Tribal Leader is warranted. In the crafting case it is a covert action; other players do not know what project cards you may be holding and is easily played off as though you don't have resources to craft it yet. I imagine in other scenarios there may be more of a drive for players to compete directly with each other and there is a "Scenario 5" that I believe is designed around replayability and meant to be the player vs player scenario.
My only complaints for the game were that initial set up takes longer than I'd like and there is some hunt and pecking in the rule book. Also the "quick reference" sheet that is the most helpful rules reference is on the back of the scenario sheet which was not obvious at first. In later play throughs all that we needed was that quick reference. And good news is that once everything is sorted and the players better understand the reason for the setup it goes much faster.
I suppose the more we play the game we may exhaust the two scenarios that came with the game, but I suspect by the time we get there we will be done with the game and personally I find it interesting that we could get a used copy that would deliver a brand new and unique adventure (even though many reviews note there is not that much difference form one copy to the next even if the components are different).
The second game gifted over the holidays was Photosynthesis. This has been on my list for a while. As an avid gardener the aesthetic of this game spoke to me. The green, orange,yellow, and blue of the trees looks great on the table.
The game falls into the "easy to learn, hard to master" category. Other than punching a lot of cardboard set up is a breeze. The game plays quickly as well and boils down to a simple loop of "plant seeds, grow trees, collect points, THROW SHADE".
That last bit about throwing shade is where the "hard to master" part comes in. Players really have to think in three dimensions and future planning is well rewarded. Where trees are planted, when they are planted, and what stage you are going to grow them to while the sun rotates around the board offers an amazing array of choice.
Do you want to shade your opponent out or take that fully developed tree off the board to score the points? You could grow that tree, but now it shades your other tree for two turns which will leave you a point short to score a bigger tree.... BUT in three turns it will shade out your opponent for the next four turns!
The game plays fast (excepting the chess-level thinkers out there) and has won an immediate place in our family's rotation of games.
Warmachine High Command
This is one from the bargain bin at our local Ollies (#olliesarmy represent!). High Command is a card drafting game set in the Iron Kingdoms setting of Warmachine. I would best describe it as a drafting version of Smash Up for folks that want the Warhammer 40k aesthetic instead (yes I said Warhammer damn it!).
Players pick a cross selection of cards to play (like picking two factions in Smash Up) and then slowly draft them into your discard deck so you can eventually shuffle them back into your draw pile to get and play. There are also war casters that sit on the sideline waiting to be rushed in for a single glorious predictable turn before being removed from the game.
Characters and war casters are deployed to locations (just like Smash Up) eventually waiting for one side to out muscle the other and claim the location as a prize (just like Smash Up).
As you may be able to suss out by the snarky review I was not impressed by the game. The cards are a mess. The text is tiny, iconography is horrible, and over all plays is a slog. The best part is the random end to the game which can occur at any moment once the game progresses to the "stage 3" event cards that represent the turns. Do I have one turn? Two? Who knows! Throw in locations that benefit a specific faction only (and it sure is likely will be your opponents) and its lovely.
The good news is my oldest son