Battlefield 2042 is FUN

 

We're back on Iwo Jima in Battlefield 2042!

 With the Battlefield 6 open beta behind us and its release imminent, EA/DICE has decided to have one last hurrah in Battlefield 2042 with a special event that brings the famed Iwo Jima map from past Battlefields into the specialist-laden 2042. And boy, is it fun.

 First, the size of Iwo Jima puts everything in Battlefield 6 to shame. If someone told me you could fit all of the BF6 maps into Iwo Jima in 2042, I would believe it. That’s how big the map feels and plays. The map features everything from a naval fleet offshore—where the attackers launch from—all the way up to a volcano riddled with a maze of caves (as was common on Japanese-held islands during WWII). Everything about the map screams “this is Battlefield.”

 Another winning aspect of 2042 compared to 6 is the presence of tons of vehicles. Iwo Jima, for example, features upwards of 17 vehicles fighting it out. Helicopters are constantly overhead, tanks and IFVs are always pushing forward, and boats come rushing through the water during the initial sea deployment. A moment rarely goes by without a vehicle causing havoc, and it creates the glorious Battlefield experience I expect. Compare that to BF6, where the largest beta map featured, at most, four vehicles. Vehicles you rarely saw, either because they were paper-thin or—like jets—spent their time a mile away from the actual map thanks to the tiny ground area compared to the vast overhead airspace.

 You might think that with 2042’s vehicle count, the infantry experience would be miserable, but that’s far from the truth. Infantry gameplay is really solid on Iwo Jima. While it’s a big map, there are numerous compact points of interest with good fortifications that let infantry dodge and weave incoming vehicle fire and fight it out for final control of the points. On top of that, the map’s size allows anti-air players to step back from the frontline and focus on harassing air targets.

 Then there are the specialists, which many Battlefield players felt were a huge misstep for 2042, pushing it closer to a hero shooter than a Battlefield title. While that may have been the case at launch when there was no corresponding class system, that’s no longer true. Specialists now fit neatly into the class system and offer a ton of fun gameplay options thanks to their unique gadgets. Honestly, I’m a little sad they’re missing in BF6. I don’t think they were absolutely necessary, but in terms of fun, specialists add a lot of variety. In their current state in 2042, they complement the Battlefield classes really well.

 Overall, I’m having a blast jumping back into 2042. I’m not even performing well—I’ve placed in the bottom half of the scoreboard each match, my K:D ratio is below 1, and I’ve been on the losing side more often than not. In fact, I was doing much better in the Battlefield 6 beta, where I had close to a 2:1 K:D ratio and regularly topped the scoreboard. Yet I wasn’t having fun in 6, while I’m having an absolute blast in 2042.

 2042 just has so much more to offer thanks to the maps, specialist shenanigans, and the vehicle-vs-infantry balance. All of that to say: if you want a FUN Battlefield experience, jump into 2042 and skip 6’s launch. Maybe BF6 will turn things around, and years from now, we’ll be having the same comeback discussion about it—just like we’re having now about 2042, years after its launch.

Note: this post was edited with the help of AI (ChatGPT). The thoughts are my own.  The grammatical correctness and em dashes (—) are the AI.   

Battlefield 6's Trailer Was A Lie

 Battlefield 6 just wrapped its second beta weekend and the community is divided. Some players swear it’s the next big thing, but I walked away shaking my head. This wasn’t the Battlefield I grew up on. Instead of sprawling, all-out-warfare, we got jammed into tiny, overcrowded maps that felt more like that other shooter. And after rewatching that first reveal trailer, I can say it outright: it was a lie.

 I grabbed some screen grabs from that original trailer (which you can view on YouTube here).  Comments are added in the caption of each image.  Where, oh where, are these epic Battlefields we see in the trailer because they certainly were not in the open beta weekends.

There is in fact no vehicles, let alone helicopters, on this map.  The bridge as well is not part of the map.  This could have been such a cool experience if the bridge and adjoining housing area were all part of the map.  But nope; instead we get a couple blocks of murder tunnel buildings.

 

Remember Gulf of Oman?  Heartlessgamer does.  This clip from the video led me to believe maybe we'd be heading back to that classic map.  Maybe it'll be included upon release?

Multiple vehicles!? Tanks no less!  Sign me up.  Oh wait; sorry the best the Battlefield 6 beta could offer is two vehicles and zero open spaced on the map.

An army running off to fight?  Not in Battlefield 6 beta where most matches felt like a couple squads.  Battlefield 6 also did the rare thing in the series and took a step back on max player count on a map.  Apparently 128 was too many so we have to go back to 64.  I guess that's fine since they also made tiny little maps instead of sprawling battlefields.

This image is the heart breaker because what is shown here would be an amazing start to a Gulf of Oman style map made in a modern Battlefield game.  None of the maps have anything close to this image. How the hell did they put this in the trailer and miss that this, THIS, is what we expect of Battlefield games?

See; they were trying to warn us in the trailer.  The trailer, in fact, wasn't anywhere close to the actual game we were going to get.

Dune Awakening Patches Just Don't Go Well

 

 Dune Awakening is having a rough patch day.  While the most recent patch brings a slew of improvements to the game and makes the end game deep desert more approachable for players not interested in PvP it also has brought a host of issues.

 The biggest issue players seem to be facing are crashes or being stuck on the entering server screen.  Players are reporting that when pressing "continue" to enter a server they get stuck on the loading/entering server screen for several minutes.  Others are reporting they are just crashing at this step.  No workaround is known as of this posting.

 Next; it seems like a new dupe has been likely introduced (while old dupes were fixed in the patch).  This time instead of naked players sacrificing themselves at the auction house in the capital cities we have naked players sacrificing themselves a the public thopter transport stations.  At this point in Dune Awakening it is assumed any naked players using respawn anywhere is some form of exploit to dupe items.

 The patch brought us the coveted "depost/extract all water" feature which will save millions of clicks for players.  Also full water containers can now be sold.  However, the change also seems to have brought the ability for players to enter other players bases and steal their water.  Players are logging in to find their cisterns drained.

 And not necessarily on the "bug" front but the community seems torn on the changes to the Deep Desert.  Previously players had to venture far into the PvP region of the desert to find Tier 6 resource nodes to harvest.  A bit of risk for a big reward.  Now the PvE area of the desert is loaded with Tier 6 resources and there is a mad scramble to lock in those safe PvE areas for harvesting.  Personally I see it as a good change but understand the community feedback that it takes away from the risk/reward that the PvP deep desert provided.

 I am still playing the game and will check out the patch some more.  

Camelot Unchained Video

 I did something I rarely do: I watched a YouTube video at normal speed. Why?  Because Camelot Unchained has a new video out and I needed to evaluate the game at normal speed.  You can watch the video below and then read on for my thoughts. 

 For a bit of catch up; Camelot Unchained is a crowd funded MMO piloted by Mark Jacobs of Dark Ages of Camelot (DAoC) and Mythic Entertainment fame.  It has been in development now for 13 years since it was first kick started in the heyday of Kickstarer.  The supposed "beta 1" has been ongoing for at least 7 years at this point.  To say it's been a long time coming is being polite.

 So what did we get for 13 years of development? To be honest: a game that looks like it was being released 13 years ago.  The graphics are antiquated, the UI is yesterday, and the player movement/combat looks dated.

 But, and I mean this as a big but, it looks playable and visuals aside I can at least see myself being interested in giving the game a try should it ever make an open beta or release.  While everything felt slow in the video and polish is missing (damage numbers going to the 8th decimal point for example) I still got a sense for what they were aiming for and I got some DAoC vibes when they were on 

 There are some other details we could squabble about such as it seems range play dominates the combat as we see almost no melee range combat in the video.  The archer that is featured seems to have a very, very long range.  Also the PvE featured is pretty generic; pull a mob and kill it before it can get to you then run away if it does get to you.

 Anyways I'm not here to squabble.  I am just excited to see a game from this team.  Yes, I know there is a bunch of controversy around Mark Jacobs and how he has run things but I'd be lying if I said there isn't drama around every crowd funded MMO at this point.  Just get me the game so I can get the bit of value my Kickstarter dollars I invested.

Battlefield 6 Open Beta Thoughts

Here we go.... again

 The Battlefield 6 open beta opened it's doors early this week and lots of players are jumping in; me included.  I have some thoughts and I am going to come right out and say it: I am not sure what this is but it isn't Battlefield.

 I've never swung so far from hype to disappointment with a game in my entire gaming career.  Coming off an extremely well executed multiplayer reveal event it felt like EA / Dice had everything headed in the right direction for Battlefield 6.  We were back to Battlefield baby!

 How wrong I was now that I am getting a taste of the beta.  It is hard to put into words but the feel of the game is closer to Call of Duty (CoD) than it is Battlefield.  Maps feel claustrophobic, gunplay is sloppy, movement is filled with slides, and I have no idea what they are doing with classes.  How hard was it to just stick with the classic assault, medic, support, and engineer?  Why does everything have to get mixed up and why are weapons not locked to classes?

A dusty street; wonder where the enemy is hiding

 The visuals and sounds of the game are amazing, but the visual clutter (smoke, dust, stuff flying around, etc) makes it very difficult to figure out what is going on.  Enemies that are inside buildings are basically invisible.  It is nearly impossible to look and know where you should expect enemies and where you should not.  It doesn't help that, at least in the beta, the maps feel like they are more corridor shooters than they are battlefields.  Players are just constantly funneled into meat grinders.

 I had hoped with the return of destruction that we'd be able to get some creative ways to get around the meat grinders, but it seems like maps are designed in a way that you can destroy everything around the meat grinder but not the actual meat grinder itself.  Players have to go through them.

 Another area I can't eloquently describe in words, but I'll try is a quote I'll take from my son: "TTK is high but TTD is low".  Basically the amount of time it takes to kill a target feels high but the time it takes you to die is low.  I have had so many encounters where I empty my magazine but haven't landed the kill so have to change to a sidearm to finish it off which then puts me at a disadvantage if there is another player in the fight.  Yet at the same time if I stick my head out around a corner I'm ending up dead instantly.  There has also been times, even when watching the recorded video back, where the damage log in game shows me taking 5 distinct damage but all I can tell is the enemy pulled the trigger one time.  I am assuming there is some desync going on between server and client but it's hard to tell.

Vehicles feel grounded and powerful

 The moment to moment gameplay also offers no downtime or rest.  It is constant action in every mode I've tried; whether conquest or breakthrough.  I can't even count how many times I've broken through enemy lines where I felt like I could take a moment to get my bearings only to have yet another player appear right next to me from some hidden alleyway; they being as surprised to see me as I am to see them.  That constant fight or flight feeling is more a CoD thing than it has ever been a Battlefield thing.

 It is also telling when CoD fans are out there claiming "CoD is dead!" after playing BF6.  This clearly shows 6 is catering towards the CoD fans.  There are numerous CoD streamers that are binging the beta and loving every minute of it. So it really does seem like Battlefield 6 was catering to that segment.

"Large scale battles" minus the "large scale"

 

 With that said there is still vehicles and larger scale fights to be had in Battlefield 6, but they are a lot harder to find than I'd of expected. If someone told me I was playing the next Call of Duty I'd of believed them.  Even the UI feels closer to CoD than it does to Battlefield.  It's a damn shame. Honestly if I want a Battlefield fix I am going back to 2042. For all of it's flaws at least 2042 feels like a Battlefield game. 

Blogging Medium

 I promised as part of Blaugust 2025 that I would talk about and maybe search for a new blogging platform.  I've been on Google's Blogger (aka Blogspot) for over 20 years now and it hasn't had a major update of any sort in several years.  Before I get to exploration of entirely new platforms I do want to talk about a couple that I did already try.  The first one up is Medium and I have some thoughts.

 First, you can visit my experiment on Medium here:  https://medium.com/@heartlessgamer 

 What I liked about Medium is it's clean design. Black text, white background, and no effort to make that simple and clean template become a reality.  Also attractive at the time I tried it was the fact it can import Blogger posts with just a couple clicks so it was easy to port in content for testing purposes.

 A couple features I liked but didn't get to experience were the ability for visitors to leave me private messages as well as the ability to add a "tip the author" option on posts.  I could do the tip thing via any number of services with my blogger blog but that'd take extra effort vs the integrated option with Medium. 

 What I didn't like was that Medium felt like an ecosystem where I was just another cog in the grand scheme.  It felt like I was just putting my posts into a social media platform vs running my own blog.  I also dislike that Medium, like other platforms I investigated, require a cost to use your own custom domain.  It is hard to beat the fact that Blogger supports your own domain at no cost.

 Ultimately Medium didn't hook me and I gave up on it shortly after starting. I wouldn't say it is "off the list" because the member fee is only $5 a month which is not terrible compared to other platforms I'll talk more about in the coming days.